Thread 02 · Technology and Dehumanization · September 25, 2026

A tool too good to be honest

The RCMP used facial recognition software built on photos that the commissioners found had been collected illegally; even the police must know where their tools come from.

1 · The scene

At the counter of a convenience store in Saint-Hyacinthe, Karim holds an almost-new phone, offered at half price. The seller shrugs: "Where's it from? No idea."

Karim hesitates. The price is good, and he needs one. But if the device was stolen from someone, buying it makes you a bit of an accomplice. He puts it back on the counter.

Original vignette

2 · The documented case

The RCMP and Clearview AI

In October 2019, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police bought two licences for facial recognition software from Clearview AI, a company whose database was built by copying billions of photos from the Internet. According to the special report of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, tabled in Parliament on June 10, 2021, the company recorded 521 searches made from RCMP accounts. At least 19 accounts existed, 17 of them free trial accounts.

Only about 6% of these searches appear to be linked to victim identification work by the national child exploitation centre. About 85% are not accounted for in any way. The Commissioner concluded that the RCMP had contravened the Privacy Act: a public body cannot collect information from a third party that itself obtained it illegally. The RCMP disputes this conclusion but accepted all the recommendations; it also created a program to assess new technologies before using them.

The Commissioner also points out that facial recognition can produce racially biased results. In May 2022, the federal, provincial and territorial commissioners jointly called for a legal framework setting clear limits for police, with "no-go zones" to prevent mass surveillance.

Admitting a mistake, listening to those who report it, changing its practices: this is how an institution regains the trust of everyone it serves.

521searches recorded from RCMP accounts
85%of searches the RCMP could not account for

3 · The voice

“Facial recognition must be used responsibly and with great caution.”
Daniel Therrien, Privacy Commissioner of Canada, 2021

4 · The question

If a tool saves us time but rests on harm done to others, what does it really cost our community?

Sources

  1. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, special report to Parliament on the RCMP's use of Clearview AI, June 10, 2021. www.priv.gc.ca
  2. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, news release, June 10, 2021. www.priv.gc.ca
  3. Federal, provincial and territorial commissioners, call for a legal framework for police use of facial recognition, May 2, 2022. www.priv.gc.ca

Every figure on this page links to a verifiable public source.

Tags

Read also

Thread 02

A resemblance is not proof

In Detroit, a Black father was wrongly arrested in front of his daughters because of software; his courage changed the police's rules.

Read
Thread 02

Three billion faces without permission

A company copied billions of faces online to sell them to police; four Canadian commissioners said no together.

Read
Thread 07

A law against online hate, still awaited

In 2024, Ottawa tabled a bill on online harms. It died on the order paper, but the question remains wide open.

Read