Thread 02 · Technology and Dehumanization · September 25, 2026

The machine does not refuse alone

Ottawa requires its departments to assess the risks of their algorithms before using them, and to keep a human in the loop when the answer is no.

1 · The scene

In a café in Parc-Extension, Priya refreshes her email for the tenth time. Her mother, still in India, is waiting for an answer so she can come and hold her first grandchild.

A friend told her: "Now it's a computer that decides." Priya stares at her screen. Can a computer understand what it means for a grandmother to cross the planet for a baby?

Original vignette

2 · The documented case

The federal directive on automated decision-making

Since 2019, the Government of Canada has governed its own algorithms through a Treasury Board directive on automated decision-making. It covers decisions that affect people's rights or interests, such as reviewing a benefits application or entry into the country, and applies to systems designed or purchased after April 1, 2020. Its goal: transparent, accountable and fair decisions.

Before launching a system, a department must complete an Algorithmic Impact Assessment: 65 questions on risks and 41 on ways to reduce them. The result places the system on one of four impact levels and must be published on the Open Government Portal. Revised in 2023, the directive strengthens bias testing and the obligation to explain decisions.

A concrete example: since 2018, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada has used advanced analytics to sort temporary resident visa applications, first those from China and India. The system identifies simple files, whose eligibility can be assessed 87% faster. But officers still make the final decision, and the department says it reviews its tools to detect bias.

The lesson is simple: a machine can help, but it is a human being who must carry the weight of a refusal, and answer for it.

106questions in the Algorithmic Impact Assessment
4impact levels, from lowest to highest
87%faster to assess the eligibility of simple files

3 · The voice

“The system never refuses applications, nor does it recommend refusals.”
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, note to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, 2022

4 · The question

When a decision changes the course of a life, whom would you want to hear the answer from, and why?

Sources

  1. Government of Canada, Algorithmic Impact Assessment. www.canada.ca
  2. Government of Canada, Guide on the Scope of the Directive on Automated Decision-Making. www.canada.ca
  3. Government of Canada, Amendments to the Directive on Automated Decision-Making. www.canada.ca
  4. IRCC, advanced analytics and temporary resident visa applications, note to the CIMM committee, May 12, 2022. www.canada.ca
  5. OECD.AI, profile of Canada's Directive on Automated Decision-Making. oecd.ai

Every figure on this page links to a verifiable public source.

Tags

Read also

Thread 01

"You're not from here": the weight of four words

A harmless-sounding question can draw a border. Even people born in Canada are often reminded that they supposedly come "from somewhere else."

Read
Thread 02

A compass written together

In 2018, hundreds of Montrealers helped write ten principles so that artificial intelligence serves everyone, without discrimination.

Read
Thread 02

A tool too good to be honest

The RCMP used facial recognition software built on photos that the commissioners found had been collected illegally; even the police must know where their tools come from.

Read