Thread 02 · Technology and Dehumanization · October 4, 2026

A Seat at the Table

Ottawa has just created an expert council on artificial intelligence; earlier this year, a people's consultation reminded us that those most affected must be heard too.

1 · The scene

In the basement of a neighbourhood library, about twenty folding chairs form a circle. On the board, someone has written: "AI and us."

A delivery driver explains that an app decides his shifts. A teacher talks about assignments her students no longer write entirely on their own. An older woman, who came with her neighbour, raises her hand: "If the machine gets me wrong, who do I talk to?"

Nobody has a complete answer. But as they stack the chairs, everyone leaves with the same feeling: for once, someone asked for their opinion.

Original vignette

2 · The documented case

Who Advises, Who Is Consulted

On October 2, Prime Minister Mark Carney launched the Prime Minister's National Council on Artificial Intelligence. It has thirteen members, including two Montreal figures: AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio and Mila CEO Valérie Pisano. The council will guide Ottawa on AI adoption, research, talent and sovereign infrastructure; the prime minister added that it will also help manage the risks.

How was the federal "AI for All" strategy built? In October 2025, Ottawa held a 30-day consultation "sprint." More than 11,300 people took part; their answers were sorted with the help of AI models, then validated by humans. In an open letter, more than 160 organizations and experts criticized a task force that leaned heavily toward industry, and a timeline too short for the people most affected to take part.

Rather than only protesting, these groups launched their own People's Consultation on AI on January 21, 2026, with tools for drafting submissions together. A citizens' roundtable was scheduled in Montreal for February 25. On March 30, 65 submissions were delivered to the prime minister and his ministers: fears of job losses, calls to assess public-sector AI through a human rights lens, and for more transparency in immigration and policing.

The new council brings together valuable expertise, especially in AI safety. The question is how it will hear those these tools affect first: delivery drivers, seniors, newcomers, students. A technology that changes everyone's life is better shaped with everyone.

13members of the new national AI council, launched October 2, 2026
11,300+participants in the 30-day federal consultation, October 2025
65submissions delivered by the People's Consultation on AI, March 2026

3 · The voice

“[…] those hardest hit often see the future first, but are the last to be heard.”
Cynthia Khoo, technology and human rights lawyer, senior fellow at the Citizen Lab, 2026

4 · The question

As machines learn to decide for us, whose rarely heard voice in our own circle should we help be heard?

Sources

  1. Prime Minister Carney launches new National Council on Artificial Intelligence (Prime Minister's Office, 2026, French version) www.pm.gc.ca
  2. Ottawa launches new national AI council to advise on safety, deployment (The Canadian Press, via Yahoo News, 2026) ca.news.yahoo.com
  3. Engagements on Canada's next AI Strategy: Summary of inputs (Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, 2026) ised-isde.canada.ca
  4. Civil Society Launches People's Consultation on AI Today (BC Civil Liberties Association, 2026) bccla.org
  5. People's Consultation on AI attracts 65 submissions to feds (Future of Good, 2026) futureofgood.co
  6. News & Updates (People's Consultation on AI, 2026) www.peoplesaiconsultation.ca

Every figure on this page links to a verifiable public source.

Tags

Read also

Thread 02

A compass written together

In 2018, hundreds of Montrealers helped write ten principles so that artificial intelligence serves everyone, without discrimination.

Read
Thread 02

The machine does not refuse alone

Ottawa requires its departments to assess the risks of their algorithms before using them, and to keep a human in the loop when the answer is no.

Read
Thread 02

A tool too good to be honest

The RCMP used facial recognition software built on photos that the commissioners found had been collected illegally; even the police must know where their tools come from.

Read