Thread 03 · Racialized but Human · October 4, 2026
Who Counted as a Person?
The 1929 Persons Case was a real victory, but it did not benefit all women, and some of the women who won it also shut others out.
1 · The scene
At the museum, a Grade 5 class stops in front of a photo of five women in hats. The guide tells them about their victory: in 1929, women became "persons" in the eyes of the law.
A student raises her hand. "All women? My grandmother too?"
The guide hesitates, then sits down on the bench, at the children's eye level. "That's a very good question. Let's take all the time it needs."
Original vignette
2 · The documented case
A Door Opened, but Not for Everyone
In 1927, five Alberta women, Emily Murphy, Nellie McClung, Louise McKinney, Irene Parlby and Henrietta Muir Edwards, asked whether the word "persons" in the British North America Act included women, which would allow them to sit in the Senate. On April 24, 1928, the Supreme Court said no. On October 18, 1929, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London overturned that ruling.
The federal government itself acknowledges that the decision did not include all women, such as Indigenous women and women of Asian heritage and descent. Manitoba goes further: the Famous Five limited their calls for equality to a select type of woman, largely excluding racialized, disabled, 2SLGBTQ+ and Indigenous women.
There is darker still. According to The Canadian Encyclopedia, Emily Murphy and Nellie McClung supported sterilization in the 1920s. From 1928 to 1972, under Alberta's Sexual Sterilization Act, 2,834 people were sterilized; First Nations and Métis people made up more than 25 per cent of them.
Should the date be erased? Manitoba suggests widening it instead, by also telling the story of Indigenous women's leadership. In 1979, one of the first recipients of the Governor General's Award in Commemoration of the Persons Case was Mary Two-Axe Earley, a Kanien'kehá:ka woman from Kahnawà:ke who was fighting to regain the status the law had taken from her. The "us" rarely widens all at once: we must keep asking who is still left outside.
3 · The voice
“The exclusion of women from all public offices is a relic of days more barbarous […]”
“they also actively worked to perpetuate others.”
4 · The question
When we celebrate a victory for "everyone," can we name those who were still waiting at the door, and invite them to tell their part of the story?
Sources
- Persons Day (Women and Gender Equality Canada) www.canada.ca
- Persons Day (Government of Manitoba) gov.mb.ca
- Famous 5 (The Canadian Encyclopedia) thecanadianencyclopedia.ca
- Eugenics in Canada (The Canadian Encyclopedia) thecanadianencyclopedia.ca
- Statement by the Prime Minister on Persons Day (Prime Minister's Office, 2024, French version) www.pm.gc.ca
- Mary Two-Axe Earley (The Canadian Encyclopedia) thecanadianencyclopedia.ca
Every figure on this page links to a verifiable public source.
Tags
Read also
231 calls, and a candle for each name
In 2019, the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls issued 231 Calls for Justice. Years later, families are still counting what remains to be done.
ReadA Guest in Her Own House
Born in Kahnawà:ke on October 4, 1911, Mary Two-Axe Earley led a nearly twenty-year fight for Indigenous women stripped of their status.
ReadFriends in the City
In 1950s Winnipeg, Indigenous women opened a welcoming place for people arriving alone in the city; the movement now counts more than 120 friendship centres.
Read